Partnership is not a logo exchange
A logo placement or an equipment donation alone is not an implementation partnership, and we will not describe it as one. What appears on this page reflects work that is actually happening.
Partnership
Tell us what you want to change and what you can bring. The first conversation is about whether Ubuntu Gale is genuinely the right route for it — and sometimes the honest answer is that it is not.
What happens next
What you want to change, what you can contribute, and whether Ubuntu Gale is genuinely the right route for it. Sometimes the honest answer is that someone else is a better fit.
The specific contribution, the programme or cohort it attaches to, the reporting you need and the timeline. Written down before anything is agreed.
Mission alignment, legal identity, beneficial ownership, conflicts and dependency risk — on both sides.
Terms, restrictions, recognition and reporting cadence. Restricted funding is tracked separately from the point it arrives.
The work happens. You receive reporting on the agreed cadence, and the evidence pack at the end of the cycle.
Your profile appears here once the partnership is active and you have approved the wording. Nothing is published before both are true.
Before you write
These conditions apply to every partnership regardless of size. If any of them is a problem, it is better to know now.
A logo placement or an equipment donation alone is not an implementation partnership, and we will not describe it as one. What appears on this page reflects work that is actually happening.
We check mission alignment, legal identity, beneficial ownership and the risk of dependency or undue influence. You should check us just as carefully — our registration documents are published.
Funding a cohort does not buy influence over curriculum, participant selection or what the evidence says. Where a partner's product is used, that is disclosed and it is never presented as an endorsement.
No partner receives participant contact details, and no participant appears in partner material without their own separate consent. Case studies are agreed with the person in them.
Reporting follows the published evidence ladder. A partner who funds a cohort that underperforms will be told that plainly, because the alternative makes every other report worthless.
We will decline or end a partnership that would compromise our independence, create undue dependency on a single supporter, or require us to claim something we cannot evidence.
Get in touch
Choose the role that best describes you. Each route asks only for what that conversation actually needs.
The corporate route covers contribution structures, recognition and how South African tax and B-BBEE treatment actually works — including what Ubuntu Gale is not yet eligible for.