A workshop that ends on Friday changes very little by itself. What changes a business or an organisation is what happens across the twelve, fifteen or eighteen months that follow — the coaching, the clinics, the peer group, the person you can call when it breaks.
Each of these runs on a published cadence with named people attached. None of them is a mailing list.
Mentorship
A named person who knows your context and stays with you through the cycle.
Mentors are matched after the intensive, once we know what a participant is actually building. A match is a working relationship with a defined focus and cadence, not an introduction — and it is reviewed at each adoption checkpoint so a match that is not working can be changed without anyone losing face.
Monthly one-to-one, plus asynchronous contact between sessions
Specific, supervised roles — from a two-hour task to a full cycle.
Volunteering here is scoped work with a named supervisor, not general goodwill. Every role has a written description, a time commitment, a screening step proportionate to the access it carries, and an explicit statement of what is out of scope.
From one-off micro-tasks to sustained roles across a full cycle
Convened conversations where the agenda is set by the people in the room.
Forums are scheduled, facilitated and minuted. They exist so that what participants learn does not stay locked inside one cohort — and so that Ubuntu Gale hears what is not working while there is still time to change it.
Quarterly practice forums, plus listening sessions at each cycle boundary
Short, practical sessions on one specific thing you are stuck on.
Clinics run between the intensive and the adoption review, when the gap between a working prototype and a system someone relies on becomes obvious. They are hands-on: you leave with the thing built, not with notes about building it.
Fortnightly implementation clinics during the coaching window
Ask for help when you need it, not when the calendar allows it.
Real implementation problems do not wait for the next scheduled date. Any participant can request a working session; requests are triaged within two working days and either scheduled, answered directly, or explained if they fall outside what the network can offer.
Small groups of people solving the same problem at the same time.
Circles of four to six participants meet without a facilitator present after the first two sessions. The design is deliberate: the goal is a support structure that survives the end of the programme, and a group that only ever meets with staff in the room will not.
Fortnightly for the first six months, then self-organising
Completing a cycle ends the formal programme, not the relationship. Alumni keep access to forums and the resource library, are first in line to become mentors, and are the people we ask when we need to know whether something worked two years later.
These are the same phases published in each programme roadmap, seen from the participant’s side rather than the delivery team’s. Dates move; the sequence does not.
Small Business Digital Foundations
UG-SBDF · 12-month cycle
Five days of building, then eight months of clinics and coaching while the work goes into the business, then verification and handover.
Pre
One-to-one coachingBaseline conversation
Where the business actually is before anything changes — so improvement can be measured rather than asserted.
M1
Five-day intensiveFive-day intensive
Business Outcome Canvas, Digital Readiness Diagnostic, Five-Day Action Charter and the working artefacts built across the week.
M1
Evidence gateDay 5 completion gate
At least 80% attendance, all critical artefacts, a safe working demonstration and an approved 90-day adoption plan.
M2
Implementation clinicFirst implementation clinic
The first fortnightly clinic, held when the gap between the workshop build and daily operation first becomes visible.
M2
Peer circlePeer circle forms
Four to six businesses at a similar stage, meeting fortnightly.
M3
One-to-one coachingMonthly coaching begins
A named coach working on this business's specific adoption plan.
M4
Implementation clinicClinics continue
Fortnightly, focused on whatever is blocking adoption this month.
M5
Community forumCross-cohort practice forum
What is working and what is not, across every business in the cycle.
M6
Adoption reviewSix-month adoption review
Is the system in use? If not, why not — and what would have to change.
M8
WorkshopRemediation workshop
For businesses where adoption has stalled. Attending is not a failure; it is the point of a 12-month cycle.
M10
Adoption reviewAdoption verification
Independent check that what was built is still in use and still owned locally.
M11
Evidence gateOutcome evidence review
Evidence assessed against the published ladder before any public claim is made.
M12
HandoverExit and handover
Documentation, ownership and support routes transferred. Alumni network access begins.
Community Technology Catalyst
UG-CTC · 15-month cycle
Co-design before the intensive, a prototype built during it, then nine months of organisational strengthening around whoever has to run it.
Pre
Community forumCo-design sessions
The organisation defines the problem before anyone proposes a technology.
M1
One-to-one coachingOrganisational baseline
Capacity, systems and the realistic amount of change this organisation can absorb.
M2
Five-day intensiveFive-day intensive
Two to three representatives per organisation build the Technology Catalyst Decision Pack.
M2
Evidence gatePrototype acceptance gate
Critical acceptance criteria pass or carry approved treatment. The prototype remains explicitly labelled non-production.
M3
Implementation clinicConfiguration clinics
Turning a labelled prototype into something the organisation can safely operate.
Working with the person who will actually run the system, not only the person who attended.
M6
Community forumDelivery network forum
Organisations, delivery partners and technology contributors in one room.
M7
Adoption reviewMid-cycle adoption review
Whether the organisation owns the system, or whether it still depends on us.
M9
WorkshopData and safeguarding workshop
Handling of beneficiary information, consent and retention, before the system holds real records at scale.
M11
Implementation clinicSustainability clinic
Cost, maintenance and what happens when the person who runs it leaves.
M13
Adoption reviewAdoption verification
Independent check on use, ownership and safeguards.
M14
Evidence gateOutcome evidence review
Evidence assessed against the published ladder.
M15
HandoverHandover and exit
Full documentation, supplier handover checklist and ongoing network access.
Digital Skills in Practice
UG-DSIP · 18-month cycle
Two delivery cycles with a corrective learning gate between them, built around team challenges and individual portfolios.
Pre
One-to-one coachingLearner baseline and access check
Device, connectivity and language needs established before a cohort is planned — not discovered on day one.
M2
Five-day intensiveCycle 1 intensive
Teams of four to six build toward the Team Challenge Delivery Pack.
M2
Evidence gatePortfolio integrity gate
Version history, source and AI-use disclosure, and no prohibited data or production dependency.
M3
Peer circleTeam practice circles
Teams continue meeting between formal sessions.
M4
WorkshopEmployer-led workshop
Practitioners describing what the work actually looks like, and reviewing portfolio quality.
M5
One-to-one coachingMentor review begins
Mentor review of portfolio quality against published criteria.
M7
Community forumLearner forum
What is helping, what is not, and what the second cycle should change.
M9
Adoption reviewProgression review
Where each learner is against the evidence ladder, and what would move them up it.
M12
Evidence gateCorrective learning gate
A formal decision point: what the first cycle got wrong, and what changes before the second runs.
M13
Five-day intensiveCycle 2 intensive
The revised design, delivered to the second group.
M16
WorkshopProgression and referral workshop
Portfolios, referrals and employer introductions — with no guarantee of employment attached.
M17
Evidence gateOutcome evidence review
Evidence assessed against the published ladder across both cycles.
M18
HandoverCompletion and alumni entry
Individual portfolio case studies finalised. Alumni network access begins.
Months 18–36
And after the cycle ends.
Completing a cycle ends the formal programme, not the relationship. The extended track is optional, and it runs on the principle that the people best placed to help the next cohort are the ones who have already done it.
01
Months 18–24
Consolidate
Quarterly check-ins and access to clinics while the system beds in beyond the coaching window. The question at this stage is durability, not novelty.
Quarterly adoption check-in
Clinic access on request
Forum participation
02
Months 24–30
Contribute
Alumni who have run a system for two years know things no facilitator can teach. This stage moves them from receiving support to giving it — as mentors, workshop contributors or case-study subjects.
Mentor onboarding, if they choose it
Contribute a practice case study
Peer circle facilitation
03
Months 30–36
Extend
Longitudinal evidence collection. This is where a claim about lasting outcomes becomes defensible — because there is three-year data behind it rather than an exit-survey response.
Longitudinal outcome interview
Independent verification, where consented
Ongoing network membership
What we commit to
The network asks for your time. Here is what it owes you.
A real role, not a waiting list
If we cannot offer you a defined role with a supervisor, we will say so rather than hold your details indefinitely.
Induction before you start
Nobody is placed with a participant before they have been through boundaries, escalation and the code of conduct.
A named person to raise concerns with
Every role has a supervisor, and a route past that supervisor if the concern is about them.
Your time is not wasted
Sessions are prepared, participants are briefed, and a cancellation reaches you as early as we know about it.
Expenses are not a barrier
Agreed travel and data costs are reimbursed. Ask before you incur them and the answer will be clear.